Dalliance Discounts – De Facto Provisions Of The Family Law Act

Home » Blog » Dalliance Discounts – De Facto Provisions Of The Family Law Act

If you’re thinking of sharing your bed with someone sometime soon, it might be best to stop and think about precisely what you may be signing up for.

Since 1 March 2009 the Family Law Act has applied not only to married couples, but also to people living together in a de facto relationship. That means you don’t have to be legally married to someone in order to become entitled to a share of their assets if and when the relationship breaks down. If a court interprets the union between two people to be in the nature of a de facto relationship, the property of both parties will be up for grabs when the final curtain falls. And that can sometimes lead to somewhat unexpected consequences.

Picture: Andrea Piacquadio

Source: Pexels

In a recent Federal Circuit Court case a middle-aged sex worker sued one of her clients for a big chunk of his life savings on the basis that their regular sexual trysts had become a lot more than just cold hard monkey business. It started out innocently enough – money for sex, no questions asked, and no complications. But as the months and years rolled by, the pair became so friendly she began treating her favourite client to regular freebies, and even cut him a special weekend discount rate. In return he took her away on a string of holidays together, and the lines between business and pleasure became decidedly blurred.

When they finally terminated their arrangement after more than a decade of dirty dealings, she applied to the courts for a division of his property under the de facto provisions of the Family Law Act. And it was a near-run thing. The Judge found she had made contributions to the union, and their arrangement showed some mutual commitment to a shared life, suggesting a de facto relationship. But in the end, because they had remained financially independent of one another, and socialised together relatively rarely, he ruled the relationship didn’t enliven the de facto provisions of the Family Law Act.

The respondent ultimately retained his assets, but only after some very anxious moments. Looks like there really is no such thing as free sex.

Nyst Legal – Family Law

Share the post

Recent Posts

Categories

Categories

More To Read

Our Alex Somers and Nicola Ellis have been named as finalists in the Lawyers Weekly 30 Under 30 Awards 2024. Alex has been named a finalist in the Criminal category, and Nicola in the Real Estate category.   The Lawyers Weekly 30 Under 30 Awards 2024 is an exciting nationwide recognition program showcasing outstanding young guns and […]

“Chris Nyst took to the stage – along with film producer Trish Lake and award-winning actor David Wenham - to take part in a lively Q&A, hosted by local radio personality Bern Young, to announce the long-awaited sequel to their 2003 crime/comedy triumph, Gettin’ Square.”
“The new Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023, introduced in recent weeks by Queensland Attorney-General Yvette D’Ath, has got plenty of prospective property developers more than a little excited.”

Recent Posts

Categories

Contact us and see
how we can help

Whether your matter is civil, criminal or commercial in nature, our team at Nyst Legal has all the experience, expertise and diligence necessary to ensure that you achieve the absolute best available result.